| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Is jdm_delete_filehandle part of a public API? |
| From: | Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:18:20 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <53D7DA7F.2040706@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <53D7DA7F.2040706@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120122 Thunderbird/9.0 |
On 07/29/14 12:31, Eric Sandeen wrote: I was cleaning up xfsprogs to plug some leaks, and wanted to use jdm_delete_filehandle(). I noticed that it has an "hlen" argument which is unused. Can we remove that, or is this part of a public API? It's not in any manpage (or even called anywhere in xfsprogs/xfstests/xfsdump/dmapi) but it is in a public header... anyone know? If needed I guess I can just call it with hlen==0, but that seems odd. Thanks, -Eric The first thing that comes to mind is maybe they trying to distinguish between a fshandle or handle. Or they we trying to be consistent with the allocation calls. The libhandle free_handle has the same calling parameters. It also does nothing with the length. That we cannot change without breaking existing code. I will look/ask around. --Mark. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Is jdm_delete_filehandle part of a public API?, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Is jdm_delete_filehandle part of a public API?, Mark Tinguely |
| Previous by Thread: | Is jdm_delete_filehandle part of a public API?, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Is jdm_delete_filehandle part of a public API?, Mark Tinguely |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |