xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Forced quotacheck after unclean unmount since 3.11, bisected

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Forced quotacheck after unclean unmount since 3.11, bisected
From: "Cyril B." <cbay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:16:05 +0200
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alwaysdata.net; s=excellency-cbay; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=KZGXaZom73XpcmDP2rbWbvrAbtQkgGBpkGkHXopCdJo=; b=RHw04tp23Z+G6sl1V39NeuIKRZzuwIY+++yf/Srjm0jxlbmn25GcaY9FB+t31/TQSv2NrYIneTs0aq6EOjGUxjjamD/Huc4p89RB49z6HzByO/GTucZ3kI6bJDC7mMZ3CDCtVZSQNMpfSuUmGlP6jIwGeSrUGJDwEYb1EgYG/OE=;
Reply-to: cbay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Macintosh/20140602)
Hello,

I've noticed that since Linux 3.11, quotacheck always happen after unclean unmounts. Is this expected? It didn't happen on previous Linux versions.

A bisect shows that this commit is responsible:
xfs: Remove incore use of XFS_OQUOTA_ENFD and XFS_OQUOTA_CHKD
id: 83e782e1a1cc0159888e58e14dfc8f3289663338

Relevant dmesg:
[    8.844063] XFS (md4): Mounting Filesystem
[    9.054023] XFS (md4): Starting recovery (logdev: internal)
[    9.331785] XFS (md4): Ending recovery (logdev: internal)
[    9.383856] XFS (md4): Quotacheck needed: Please wait.
[   48.427732] XFS (md4): Quotacheck: Done.

More details:
  * vanilla kernel
  * on top of mdadm (RAID1)
  * xfsprogs 3.1.5
  * mount options: noatime,nosuid,nodev,grpquota,inode64
  * xfs_info:
meta-data=/dev/md4 isize=256 agcount=4, agsize=119997280 blks
         =                       sectsz=512   attr=2
data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=479989120, imaxpct=5
         =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0
log      =internal               bsize=4096   blocks=234369, version=2
         =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0

Thanks,

--
Cyril B.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>