Re: [PATCH] Detect strto* failures based on errno.

[Arkadiusz MiÅkiewicz <arekm@xxxxxxxx>]

On Wednesday 16 of July 2014, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:56:59AM +0200, Arkadiusz MiÅkiewicz wrote:
> > Code was testing for ERANGE errno only in some places. In other places
> > it didn't do any errno checking at all.
> > 
> > Unify strto* result testing by treating any non zero errno as failure.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz MiÅkiewicz <arekm@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> This patch appears to cause xfs/071 to fail:
> 
> 
> 
>      Writing 512 bytes, offset is +0 (direct=false)
>     -pwrite64: File too large
>     +non-numeric offset argument -- <OFFSET>
>      Reading 512 bytes (direct=false)
>      read 0/512 bytes at offset <OFFSET>
>     ...
>     (Run 'diff -u tests/xfs/071.out
> /home/dave/src/xfstests-dev/results//xfs/071.out.bad'  to see the entire
> diff)
> 
> Can you have a look into this?

The test runs:
xfs_io -c 'pwrite 9223373136366403583 512' file

where 9223373136366403583 is bigger than LLONG_MAX (9223372036854775807), so

# LC_ALL=C xfs_io -c 'pwrite 9223373136366403583 512' ./x
(MYDEBUG)strerror(34): Numerical result out of range
non-numeric offset argument -- 9223373136366403583


What would be best approach to fix this - some cvtunum for unsigned long long?

> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.


-- 
Arkadiusz MiÅkiewicz, arekm / maven.pl