[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Data loss XFS with RT kernel on Debian.

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Data loss XFS with RT kernel on Debian.
From: Jan de Kruyf <jan.de.kruyf@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 12:39:24 +0200
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=s9l9Bb3O/+QCl2+FCoDmmngAB1UzkFV8jvlXShM0zzU=; b=yL1PeupQ9C6Prg1ZnQlcbevf2xKqYGBuoubJ5ZOXdRN6lPGRxb5VaPALLoGYPm487P ZKlvfu7bH/AWMiJ9q/jUsDy1Wu6lpUQTFDbSQuBL4MrsoLBnA5W1hWinPWnLYaokAgt0 MBDRotOIJv/sbKIHr4q6yUXRAv7o4/AEHeoFLtkz8dmNliV+nDcN1Vy7SBrYcGw6yQci 53zIyKmvqvUajdVt8G8atJXEUI5FNOy+Ay5i0jFxLTopRK7/o7CRrd0lrzY0c9p2AT7A CUq9jjBGQPDULQb5Bvb/JCU2jTui1YTaOBkV5r9MdyoDOPr8XmLLxKzYOwRLuzRVRocu zpog==
I did post the prob in the Austin Schuh thread in the RT mailing list.
I believe they know what Austins problem is, but Thomas G. is a bit
busy it seems at the moment.

And I did start reading that thread also.
In any case kernel 3.2-rt works great with good latencies, so we will
stick to that for the time being. It was just 'feature inflation' that
made me move to a later kernel. Not always a good idea.

Thanks for your prompt answers.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>