[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfs: require 64-bit sector_t

To: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: require 64-bit sector_t
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 17:21:35 +0200
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20140617141431.GA8905@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1402937045-31103-1-git-send-email-hch@xxxxxx> <20140617141431.GA8905@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:14:31AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> Given that the existence of the string indicates large block/inode
> numbers, shouldn't we leave it to avoid any confusion? That aside, the
> rest of the patch looks fine to me.

As these have been enabled in any sane configuration I don't really see
a point in printing these.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>