| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: kill xfs_buf_geterror() |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 27 May 2014 03:44:46 -0700 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1400802807-19936-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1400802807-19936-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 09:53:27AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Most of the callers are just calling ASSERT(!xfs_buf_geterror()) > which means they are checking for bp->b_error == 0. If bp is null in > this case, we will assert fail, and hence it's no different in > result to oopsing because of a null bp. In some cases, errors have > already been checked for or the function returning the buffer can't > return a buffer with an error, so it's just a redundant assert. > Either way, the assert can either be removed. > > The other two non-assert callers can just test for a buffer and > error properly. Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] xfs: add scan owner field to xfs_eofblocks, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 02/16] xfs: move directory block translatiosn to xfs_da_btree.h, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: kill xfs_buf_geterror(), Brian Foster |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 00/16 V2] xfs: introduce struct xfs_da_geometry, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |