xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Separate mailing list for xfstests

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Separate mailing list for xfstests
From: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 12:09:12 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20140514214601.GU26353@dastard>
References: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1405141508150.9727@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140514214601.GU26353@dastard>
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23)
On Thu, 15 May 2014, Dave Chinner wrote:

> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 07:46:01 +1000
> From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: LukÃÅ Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>     linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Separate mailing list for xfstests
> 
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:20:24PM +0200, LukÃÅ Czerner wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> > 
> > I am wondering whether you're open to the idea of creating separate
> > mailing list for xfstests. It is no longer xfs specific project and
> > even though you're still a maintainer of the project, other fs folks
> > are definitely interested in the development process, but not
> > everyone might be interested in receiving everything from the
> > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx list.
> > 
> > To speak for myself I would like to help with review of xfstests
> > patches as well, but I rarely go through my xfs folder
> > unfortunately.
> > 
> > linux-fsdevel might seem as a good candidate for it, but still I
> > think that it deserves a separate ML to point people to.
> 
> Makes sense to me. fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?

That's perfect.

Thanks!
-Lukas

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>