| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>, <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Separate mailing list for xfstests |
| From: | Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 14 May 2014 11:02:47 -0400 |
| Cc: | <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fb.com; h=message-id : date : from : mime-version : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=facebook; bh=zAMPwDo5uXRfRqLMKgWgg3TWix71ihOuTx24gRPRNqM=; b=D7UlYU7LIspL91WVWI39Znz+FnRjXYnMwcdAvXhIbsyY1SfycozXouXTeyKOD8BltxtH DTm5gP+WH5XqTB0NSjciXXGrj1rUVCkyER76z8txJ8M9pe295a8nEO4jnS5w/FUSvQau wPh4ugdhhs2i0GsVvixOcyAPMUAqKGnFHOw= |
| In-reply-to: | <53738316.20601@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <alpine.LFD.2.00.1405141508150.9727@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <53738316.20601@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 |
On 05/14/2014 10:52 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 5/14/14, 8:20 AM, Lukáš Czerner wrote: >> Hi Dave, >> >> I am wondering whether you're open to the idea of creating separate >> mailing list for xfstests. It is no longer xfs specific project and >> even though you're still a maintainer of the project, other fs folks >> are definitely interested in the development process, but not >> everyone might be interested in receiving everything from the >> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx list. >> >> To speak for myself I would like to help with review of xfstests >> patches as well, but I rarely go through my xfs folder >> unfortunately. >> >> linux-fsdevel might seem as a good candidate for it, but still I >> think that it deserves a separate ML to point people to. >> >> What do you think ? > > That sounds pretty reasonable to me. We've always encouraged submissions > to cc: the other relevant lists (i.e. linux-ext4 if it's an ext4-specific > patch) and would probably still encourage that, but even from the other > angle (keeping i.e. ext4-specific and btrfs-specific patches off the > xfs list) this sounds like a good idea. +1 here. -chris |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Separate mailing list for xfstests, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Separate mailing list for xfstests, tytso |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Separate mailing list for xfstests, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Separate mailing list for xfstests, tytso |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |