[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [GIT PULL] xfs: fixes for 3.15-rc5

To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] xfs: fixes for 3.15-rc5
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 10:47:08 +1000
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CA+55aFy9B=OcqfniMiq+EhDa_rzc0-owcmbUck1FmBOU+Q-Dvw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20140508211217.GC26353@dastard> <CA+55aFy9B=OcqfniMiq+EhDa_rzc0-owcmbUck1FmBOU+Q-Dvw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 04:13:00PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > BTW, will GPG signing these pull requests cause you problems?
> Nope. But I won't be checking email signatures. GPG email signing is
> so badly done that afaik only one or two email clients support it.
> > I've
> > been signing everything "official" I send as the XFS maintainer
> > (e.g. notifications of tree updates) and I figured that pull
> > requests are about as "official" as it gets. The tag is signed, so
> > I'm not particularly worried either way...
> .. what tag? You point me at
> >   git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git xfs-fixes-for-3.15-rc5
> and that is definitely not a tag.

Hmmm, I didn't notice the output of the pull request command I ran
converted the tag to a branch. Checking my command history, it looks
like I ran request-pull before I pushed the tag. Sure be nice to get
a "tag doesn't exist upstream" error, but I'll make sure I don't do
that again.

> Did you *mean* to point me at refs/tags/xfs-for-linus-3.15-rc5, perhaps?

Yup, updated request below.


The following changes since commit 330033d697ed8d296fa52b5303db9d802ad901cc:

  xfs: fix tmpfile/selinux deadlock and initialize security (2014-04-17 
08:15:30 +1000)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git tags/xfs-for-linus-3.15-rc5

for you to fetch changes up to 8275cdd0e7ac550dcce2b3ef6d2fb3b808c1ae59:

  xfs: remote attribute overwrite causes transaction overrun (2014-05-06 
07:37:31 +1000)

Fixes for 3.15-rc5:
- fix a remote attribute size calculation bug that leads to a
  transaction overrun
- add default ACLs to O_TMPFILE files
- Remove the EXPERIMENTAL tag from filesystems with metadata CRC

Brian Foster (1):
      xfs: initialize default acls for ->tmpfile()

Dave Chinner (2):
      xfs: fully support v5 format filesystems
      xfs: remote attribute overwrite causes transaction overrun

 fs/xfs/xfs_attr.c        |   24 +++++++++++++++++++-
 fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c   |   21 +++++++++---------
 fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c   |    1 +
 fs/xfs/xfs_attr_remote.c |    8 ++++---
 fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.h    |    2 ++
 fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c        |   55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 fs/xfs/xfs_log.c         |   10 +++++----
 fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c       |    2 --
 fs/xfs/xfs_sb.c          |    4 ----
 9 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
Dave Chinner

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>