| To: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Remove xfs_check for 3.2.0? |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 9 May 2014 08:02:14 +1000 |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20140508230410.02b19431@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <536BCF95.201@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20140508203936.GV5421@dastard> <536BEBD9.4060604@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20140508230410.02b19431@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:04:10PM +0200, Emmanuel Florac wrote: > Le Thu, 08 May 2014 15:40:57 -0500 vous écriviez: > > > *shrug* ok. Let a thousand "hey my xfs_check OOM'd" emails > > blossom! :) > > > > FWIW, I did not have time to work on that prefetch bug yet today. :( > > > > Why not replace it by a script that simply states that it's useless and > to run xfs_repair -n instead? It has been completely useless for the > best part of the past ten years... This way you don't remove it but > you'll sort of fix it :) xfs_check is already just a script that wraps xfs_db. However, there's all the man page updates, all the external documentation needs to be updated, etc. IOWs, it's not just a case of a simply patching out the xfs_check script.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove XFS_TRANS_RESERVE in collapse range, Brian Foster |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove XFS_TRANS_RESERVE in collapse range, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Remove xfs_check for 3.2.0?, Emmanuel Florac |
| Next by Thread: | [GIT PULL] xfs: fixes for 3.15-rc5, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |