| To: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS tune to adaptec ASR71605 |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 7 May 2014 06:09:17 +1000 |
| Cc: | Steve Brooks <steveb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20140506155149.5cf056b5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <alpine.LRH.2.02.1405061104580.24742@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140506130008.13a1a7ee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LRH.2.02.1405061408480.24742@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140506155149.5cf056b5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 03:51:49PM +0200, Emmanuel Florac wrote: > Le Tue, 6 May 2014 14:14:35 +0100 (BST) > Steve Brooks <steveb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait: > > > Thanks for the reply Emmanuel, I installed and rua bonnie++ although > > I will need to research the results > > Yup, they're... weird :) Write speed is abysmal, but random seeks very > high. Please try my settings so that we can compare the numbers more > directly: Friends don't let friends use bonnie++ for benchmarking storage. The numbers you get will be irrelevant to you application, and it's so synthetic is doesn't reflect any real-world workload at all. The only useful benchmark for determining if changes are going to improve application performance is to measure your application's performance. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: attr cleanups, Mark Tinguely |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: don't sleep in xlog_cil_force_lsn on shutdown, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS tune to adaptec ASR71605 [SOLVED], Steve Brooks |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS tune to adaptec ASR71605, Stan Hoeppner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |