| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] common: use a relative path to fsstress |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 6 May 2014 00:53:52 -0700 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20140504214913.GP26353@dastard> |
| References: | <20140504104510.GA9510@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140504214913.GP26353@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 07:49:13AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > > > --- a/common/config > > +++ b/common/config > > @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ export MOUNT_PROG="`set_prog_path mount`" > > export UMOUNT_PROG="`set_prog_path umount`" > > [ "$UMOUNT_PROG" = "" ] && _fatal "umount not found" > > > > -export FSSTRESS_PROG="`set_prog_path fsstress $PWD/ltp/fsstress`" > > +export FSSTRESS_PROG="./ltp/fsstress" > > Why remove the set_prog_path call? i.e. this should work: > > +export FSSTRESS_PROG="`set_prog_path fsstress ./ltp/fsstress`" > > Otherwise, a comment explaining why set_prog_path is not used just > for this binary would be appropriate.... set_prog_path is only useful for tools found in $PATH, and except for fsstress we never use it for anything that we specify path to, so I don't really see the need for a comment here. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH V3] xfs: truncate_setsize should be outside transactions, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix directory readahead offset off-by-one, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] common: use a relative path to fsstress, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] xfs: consolidate xfs_inumbers, Jeff Liu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |