[Top] [All Lists]

Re: attr cleanups

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: attr cleanups
From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 08:24:35 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20140504101623.GA4947@xxxxxx>
References: <1399130415-5382-1-git-send-email-hch@xxxxxx> <53651375.9080305@xxxxxxx> <20140504101623.GA4947@xxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120122 Thunderbird/9.0
On 05/04/14 05:16, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 11:04:05AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:
Depends on how parent inode pointers are implemented, this folding the
internal version of get and set attributes could be undone.

We might have to introduce _locked version at that point.  But I'd like
to keep the xfs_name removal and other assorted cleanups.

locking is only one issue, xfs_attr_(get/set/remove) are asciii only whereas the xfs_attr_(get/set/remove)_int versions are more generic. I am thinking of not just parent inode pointers but a non-ascii character set.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>