[Top] [All Lists]

Re: attr cleanups

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: attr cleanups
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 07:52:41 +1000
Cc: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20140504101623.GA4947@xxxxxx>
References: <1399130415-5382-1-git-send-email-hch@xxxxxx> <53651375.9080305@xxxxxxx> <20140504101623.GA4947@xxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 12:16:23PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 11:04:05AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> > Depends on how parent inode pointers are implemented, this folding the 
> > internal version of get and set attributes could be undone.
> We might have to introduce _locked version at that point.  But I'd like
> to keep the xfs_name removal and other assorted cleanups.


If we need to factor the code for new additions, then we should do
that appropriately for the new code when it arrives.


Dave Chinner

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>