| To: | Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: attr cleanups |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 4 May 2014 12:16:23 +0200 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <53651375.9080305@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1399130415-5382-1-git-send-email-hch@xxxxxx> <53651375.9080305@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 11:04:05AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: > Depends on how parent inode pointers are implemented, this folding the > internal version of get and set attributes could be undone. We might have to introduce _locked version at that point. But I'd like to keep the xfs_name removal and other assorted cleanups. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | repating 208 failures, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfsprogs: xfs_copy: use exit() to replace killall(), Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: attr cleanups, Mark Tinguely |
| Next by Thread: | Re: attr cleanups, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |