xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix Q_XQUOTARM ioctl

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix Q_XQUOTARM ioctl
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 08:14:40 -0700
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5364FED5.1050203@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <535580A1.20806@xxxxxxxxxx> <20140503114816.GA31191@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5364FED5.1050203@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 09:36:05AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Whoops, missed reply-all.
> 
> Yes, it will fail this way w/o the kernel patch.
> 
> User quota gets removed OK because flags accidentally line up;
> group quota remains, so you'd see exactly this.

Ok.  Dave, can you pick it up for for-next?

> 
> -Eric
> 
> On 5/3/14, 6:48 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Can I assumes that xfs/007 failing with:
> > 
> > --- tests/xfs/007.out       2014-05-03 08:58:08.000000000 +0000
> > +++ /root/xfstests/results//xfs/007.out.bad 2014-05-03
> > 11:48:05.000000000 +0000
> > @@ -7,4 +7,4 @@
> >  *** umount
> >  *** Usage after quotarm ***
> >  core.nblocks = 0
> > -core.nblocks = 0
> > +core.nblocks = 1
> > 
> > is because this patch didn't get picked up yet?
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > xfs mailing list
> > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
---end quoted text---

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>