On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 09:36:05AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Whoops, missed reply-all.
> Yes, it will fail this way w/o the kernel patch.
> User quota gets removed OK because flags accidentally line up;
> group quota remains, so you'd see exactly this.
Ok. Dave, can you pick it up for for-next?
> On 5/3/14, 6:48 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Can I assumes that xfs/007 failing with:
> > --- tests/xfs/007.out 2014-05-03 08:58:08.000000000 +0000
> > +++ /root/xfstests/results//xfs/007.out.bad 2014-05-03
> > 11:48:05.000000000 +0000
> > @@ -7,4 +7,4 @@
> > *** umount
> > *** Usage after quotarm ***
> > core.nblocks = 0
> > -core.nblocks = 0
> > +core.nblocks = 1
> > is because this patch didn't get picked up yet?
> > _______________________________________________
> > xfs mailing list
> > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> xfs mailing list
---end quoted text---