xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix Q_XQUOTARM ioctl

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix Q_XQUOTARM ioctl
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 03 May 2014 09:36:05 -0500
Cc: xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20140503114816.GA31191@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <535580A1.20806@xxxxxxxxxx> <20140503114816.GA31191@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
Whoops, missed reply-all.

Yes, it will fail this way w/o the kernel patch.

User quota gets removed OK because flags accidentally line up;
group quota remains, so you'd see exactly this.

-Eric

On 5/3/14, 6:48 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Can I assumes that xfs/007 failing with:
> 
> --- tests/xfs/007.out 2014-05-03 08:58:08.000000000 +0000
> +++ /root/xfstests/results//xfs/007.out.bad   2014-05-03
> 11:48:05.000000000 +0000
> @@ -7,4 +7,4 @@
>  *** umount
>  *** Usage after quotarm ***
>  core.nblocks = 0
> -core.nblocks = 0
> +core.nblocks = 1
> 
> is because this patch didn't get picked up yet?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>