[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfs: test for shut down fs in xfs_dir_fsync()

To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: test for shut down fs in xfs_dir_fsync()
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 12:53:54 -0500
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Boris Ranto <branto@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <535E94A4.2060701@xxxxxxx>
References: <535E8344.2070209@xxxxxxxxxx> <20140428164754.GA17472@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <535E8D67.3010504@xxxxxxxxxx> <535E8E47.2040701@xxxxxxx> <535E8F4C.8000003@xxxxxxxxxxx> <535E94A4.2060701@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
On 4/28/14, 12:49 PM, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> On 04/28/14 12:26, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 4/28/14, 12:22 PM, Mark Tinguely wrote:
>>> On 04/28/14 12:18, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>>> On 4/28/14, 11:47 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:35:16AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>>>>> Similar to xfs_file_fsync(), I think xfs_dir_fsync() needs
>>>>>> to test for a shut down fs,
>>>>> It probably should.
>>>>>> lest we go down paths we'll
>>>>>> never be able to complete; Boris reported that during some
>>>>>> stress tests he had threads stuck in xlog_cil_force_lsn
>>>>>> via xfs_dir_fsync().
>>>>> But this could still happen if we get a shutdown coming in after that
>>>>> test.
>>>> True... that looked a bit hairier to sort out.  :(
>>>> -Eric
>>> Are the sync lsn look okay? Was there an error writing the iclog buffer?
>>> xfs_do_force_shutdown() will also do a xlog_cil_force_lsn() via the
>>> xfs_log_force_umount if the log buffer write was not in error. That
>>> should be the same or later than this lsn.
>> I don't have full details, unfortunately, just the sysrq backtraces.
>> -Eric
>>> --Mark.
> anything in the log as to what caused the hang? You mention a forced 
> shutdown; what caused the forced shutdown?

Perhaps Boris can answer that.

> Is this the latest bits (3.15)?

It was 3.10 with backported xfs bits from about 3.14.


> --Mark.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>