| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: test pipe resizing |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Apr 2014 12:20:52 -0700 |
| Cc: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <5359625B.3090001@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <5359625B.3090001@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 02:13:31PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Add a simple test to exercise the pipe resize fcntls, > F_SETPIPE_SZ and F_GETPIPE_SZ. > > This doesn't do a whole lot, but does some pipe reading > and writing, some pipe resizing and checking, validates > that we get EBUSY if we try to resize below the current > size of buffers in the pipe, that the minimum is limited > to PAGE_SIZE, etc. How is this a filesystem issue? I think this belongs into ltp. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] xfstests: test pipe resizing, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] libxfs: adding attribute fork frees xfs_inode ptr, Mark Tinguely |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] xfstests: test pipe resizing, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | How to find the inodes in XFS, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |