| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/9] db: don't claim unchecked CRCs are correct |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Apr 2014 09:13:08 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20140421070009.GC20384@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1397550301-31883-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1397550301-31883-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140421070009.GC20384@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:00:09AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > + switch (iocur_crc_valid()) {
> > + case -1:
> > + ok = "unchecked";
> > + break;
> > + case 0:
> > + ok = "bad";
> > + break;
> > + case 1:
> > + ok = "correct";
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + ok = "unknown state";
> > + break;
> > + }
>
> We should have symbolic constants for these return values. But then
> again iocur_crc_valid only has a single caller currently, is it even
> worth the effort, or should we simply inline it?
If we grow another user, I'll add an enum for it...
> Otherwise looks good,
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Thanks.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] xfs: bulletfproof xfs_qm_scall_trunc_qfiles(), Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/9] db: verify buffer on type change, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/9] db: don't claim unchecked CRCs are correct, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 7/9] repair: remove more dirv1 leftovers, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |