xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] check: add support for an external test expunging file

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] check: add support for an external test expunging file
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 20:25:50 -0400
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=thunk.org; s=ef5046eb; t=1397607950; bh=5uJUA0WduArOyoEQVSV4OpBLDTZdMxQGj14dcGeBlqQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=pkEB6gOl/jwFlPEtV09P60v8l5JtE8Xv5QDTaAnAGyVjtoI7aI/qS3cp52agAobrX pybzQBdP1TfxwR4Ygu8mZsltLP2v1ES+eAaelTiK1mLCLyJay9rpCCZrhYnM/clg4n +3Cij6o1RH+eck8OVJxxloD+BhFr3jD47ZqapRrE=
In-reply-to: <20140416001530.GU15995@dastard>
References: <1397530320-20579-1-git-send-email-tytso@xxxxxxx> <20140416001530.GU15995@dastard>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:15:30AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > If the argument to the -X option is a pathname (that is, includes a
> > '/' character), treat it as the latter case.  If it the argument to
> > the -X option is just a bare filename (that is, does not include '/'
> > character), treat it as the former.
> 
> Can you add a new option rather than overloading the existing one
> with new meanings and semantics?

If that's your preference, sure.  How does --expunge-list-file strike
you?  Or would you prefer something else?  I'm easy.  :-)

                                               - Ted

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>