xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 0/3] fs: Introduce FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE for fallocate

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fs: Introduce FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE for fallocate
From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 23:42:47 +0900
Cc: viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, tytso@xxxxxxx, adilger.kernel@xxxxxxxxx, jack@xxxxxxx, lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=4z5g4HfsDf77kpEnMLB1CtD2Yvg3mPZHYlOPZZviByQ=; b=FLRWZAcNIa+QT+6I/BN6YMveUZbbKA9KbWcjmSp+WfBqvnzghHK8hKYAEqadWzDjJw +5WgcTVIayAN7dUOV4JxW0V+k+VaePc0RYnBtAthdBEKILGBSFL0c3h7aVIWkZEaZddC E9CHW8T83PB+75vB4bvJBHXU3tKtP2JEku9RSym7TfHz9Eb+uEyNU4KU/KgAMyP2IH5f /Ax3xsV8xeiDn1OlVIlI51e21cyIMwkGXfdnp/aoDj1QXvLMcwxq5yyNFU6NTLw7XPD3 nDj1otPfMYXQnlitbTH4QMu5zhH6J/WA3xilG0cG4jQhUS1LGTd3EChZ8eikZPgOlM1A SaXQ==
In-reply-to: <20140408005417.GI27017@dastard>
References: <1396277611-10759-1-git-send-email-linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx> <20140408005417.GI27017@dastard>
2014-04-08 9:54 GMT+09:00, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:53:31PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
>> From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE was mentioned as the opposite command of collapse
>> range from discussion between Hugh Dickins and Dave Chinner.
>>
>> In continuation of the work of making the process of non linear editing
>> of
>> media files faster, we introduce here the new flag FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE
>> for fallocate.
>>
>> This flag will work opposite to the newly added FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE
>> flag.
>> As such, specifying FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE flag will insert zeroed-out
>> space
>> in between the file within the range specified by offset and len. User
>> can
>> write new data in this space. e.g. ads.
>> Like collapse range, currently we have the limitation that offset and len
>> should be block size aligned for both XFS and Ext4.
>>
>> The semantics of the flag are :
>> 1) It allocates new zeroed out on disk space of len bytes starting
>>    at offset byte without overwriting any existing data. All the data
>> blocks
>>    from offset to EOF are shifted towards right to make space for
>> inserting
>>    new blocks
>> 2) It should be used exclusively. No other fallocate flag in combination.
>> 3) Offset and length supplied to fallocate should be fs block size
>> aligned
>>    in case of xfs and ext4.
>> 4) Insert range does not work for the case when offset is
>> overlapping/beyond
>>    i_size. If the user wants to allocate space at the end of file they
>> are
>>    advised to use either ftruncate(2) or fallocate(2) with mode 0.
>> 5) It increses the size of file by len bytes.
>>
>> Namjae Jeon (3):
>>  fs: Add FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE flags for fallocate
>>  xfs: Add support FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE for fallocate
>>  ext4: Add support FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE for fallocate
>>  TODO : xfsprog: xfsio: Add support FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE for fallocate
>>  TODO : xfstests: Add insert range testcase
>
> Namjae, what's your proposed timeframe on getting the xfs_io and tes
> cases sorted out? I'm just trying to plan ahead for the next couple
> of months (i.e. the 3.16 merge cycle), so some indication of whether
> I can expect this to be complete and ready for merge within that
> timeframe would be helpful to me.
Hi. Dave.
I will post the next version's patch-set with xfs_io and xfstests next week.
Yes, I think that it can be complete before opening 3.6 merge window.
And sorry for late response and work... Currently I can not do it full time.
But will do the best for the aim that insert range would be merged in 3.6.
>
> FWIW, it would be really nice if you could add support for fsx and
> fsstress for this as well as adding corner case tests. :)
I can, I will include these jobs on next version. :)

Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>