On 4/7/14, 6:28 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 02:58:47PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> I did some mindless work during a plane ride. ;)
>> If the granularity of these patches is just too much, I could certainly
>> collapse them into fewer, bigger patches, but I figured that this would
>> make them super-trivial to review.
>> Most have no interesting commit messages aside from the subject, because
>> the subject says it all.
>> Compile-tested only, TBH.
> Looks good, except for the patch I specifically commented on.
> FWIW, this sort of cleanup will help reduce some of the register
> pressure these code paths have, and that in turn will help reduce
> stack usage, so if you can find more...
yep I was thinking along those lines. I think this is all of them;
more show up w/ GCC warnings but some are for ops that need the superset
of args. I'll do one more pass to be sure there aren't any knock-on
effects w/ these changes.