| To: | stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs umount with i/o error hang/memory corruption |
| From: | Bob Mastors <bob.mastors@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 4 Apr 2014 13:47:28 -0600 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <533EFF07.6050308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <CALjwKZAJ-R8dS13Rsj3+K3hM9p0z08qvi4ZVTYbDWKT1Biu=-Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <533EFF07.6050308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sorry, I don't think I was clear on the nature of the problem and it's wide ranging effects. Using iscsi to access block storage on another server is the goal.
A failure on the other server is possible which could result in the iscsi initiator returning i/o errors to xfs. The behavior that I would like from xfs is to put the filesystem in some kind of offline state
on an i/o error from the block device. Today xfs usually has this desirable behavior. But there is a corner case were instead xfs hangs the entire server, forcing a hard reboot. On a large file server with many filesystems using iscsi to talk to block storage on multiple
block servers, I would like the failure of a single block server to only impact the filesystems that are dependent on the block server, and to not impact the other filesystems. Bob
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs umount with i/o error hang/memory corruption, Stan Hoeppner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 10GB memorys occupied by XFS, Stan Hoeppner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs umount with i/o error hang/memory corruption, Stan Hoeppner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs umount with i/o error hang/memory corruption, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |