| To: | Tap <tap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Exponential memory usage? |
| From: | Stefan Ring <stefanrin@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 28 Mar 2014 21:09:52 +0100 |
| Cc: | Linux fs XFS <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=LqB27ZxfJcL8OHgaTWB+9mpvbBDQintuMaknkJGGqoE=; b=kkGd3L6HJ35XhMZIa/MmkGhkQqWaha94QWfd9O0V8jLpy59KXTSTQ7KIou/zesilju 2KrgCFpoKBld9WsuTJ+96DuiKmXDWH7wQdAr7EubhTiTI6HeJBclQActuDKJFIPbGf9o qOQZazYlNcY6nfUTEwr41FBN0GrTbAU1O9zy1/pEcrpPDLKgP0fK/0UG/zD0hoc+xgEF v6MPgsJdEzDNmZWU5+tm7cRPJyOxyI4De+EQXgExa2O8i9xSEz5FljiXtHJlYvCSxIuV jDYeaHMK6gP/waxr6sfuKRgSNh9h2QdXaPhbRq4FnMm6qTN+E/awN5XFXVQ5cz4rBT9p zDUw== |
| In-reply-to: | <DF4B0D0E-6D5A-4670-9301-A1DCD0EEAE6E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <DF4B0D0E-6D5A-4670-9301-A1DCD0EEAE6E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Tap <tap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > My questions are: > > 1. Is this expected? > > 2. Are there any XFS memory calculators that would have shown me this is a > problem to begin with? > > > Given it walks out of 32 GB of memory I can't be sure that upgrading to 64 or > 128 GB will *ever* help this situation. > > Note: FWIW Un-mounting the filesystem also recovers the memory. How do you determine that the system runs out of memory? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix bad hash ordering, Ben Myers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Exponential memory usage?, Stan Hoeppner |
| Previous by Thread: | Exponential memory usage?, Tap |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Exponential memory usage?, Stan Hoeppner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |