On Feb 27, 2014, at 12:21 AM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:37:59PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Btrfs volume mounts OK, although I don't know if it actually
>> withstands significant use.
> I bet that's because nobody has filled a btrfs filesystem past the
> point where it tries to access beyond 16TB on a 32 bit system and so
> it's never been reported as a bug… :/
Guess what? Someone just ran into what sounded like this very problem today on
the Btrfs list . So I reported it and referenced this thread, and it looks
like you were correct. Josef is on it .