| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_copy: accept XFS_ABTB_CRC_MAGIC |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:07:37 -0800 |
| Cc: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <530D4B68.9090905@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <530D4B68.9090905@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 08:03:20PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > xfs_copy needs a fair bit of work for CRCs because it rewrites > UUIDs by default, but this change will get it working properly > with the "-d" (duplicate) option which keeps the same UUID. I don't think ASSERTs for user supplied data are a good idea, this should be some real error handling. > However, I wonder if we should fail CRC filesystems outright > for now if -d isn't specified, because it will invalidate every > CRC and generally make a mess of things... Yeah, for now it probably should be rejected. It would also be useful to have a list of such issues in an README.v5 or TODO.v5 file in the xfsprogs tree. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] xfs_copy: accept XFS_ABTB_CRC_MAGIC, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: clean up xfs_set_maxicount & use in growfs, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] xfs_copy: accept XFS_ABTB_CRC_MAGIC, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_copy: accept XFS_ABTB_CRC_MAGIC, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |