Re: [PATCH 3/6] xfstests: fsstress punch should always have FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE set

[Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 08:15:25PM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  ltp/fsstress.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/ltp/fsstress.c b/ltp/fsstress.c
> index 4c3368f..42c8a5a 100644
> --- a/ltp/fsstress.c
> +++ b/ltp/fsstress.c
> @@ -2555,8 +2555,8 @@ punch_f(int opno, long r)
>       off = (off64_t)(lr % MIN(stb.st_size + (1024 * 1024), MAXFSIZE));
>       off %= maxfsize;
>       len = (off64_t)(random() % (1024 * 1024));
> -     mode |= FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE & random();
>       e = fallocate(fd, mode, (loff_t)off, (loff_t)len) < 0 ? errno : 0;
> +     mode |= FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE;
>       if (v)
>               printf("%d/%d: punch hole(%d) %s %s %lld %lld %d\n",
>                      procid, opno, mode,

NACK. There's nothing wrong with testing a set of parameters that
should fail in a stress test.

Regardless, the patch is wrong...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx