xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/10] fs: Introduce new flag(FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE)

To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/10] fs: Introduce new flag(FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE) for fallocate
From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:46:04 +0900
Cc: viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, bpm@xxxxxxx, tytso@xxxxxxx, adilger.kernel@xxxxxxxxx, jack@xxxxxxx, mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=xQJZv2oIhD65MRYahqt0Uz99ezDoqczosDo049bZhW4=; b=g/oazYo8E59ey+GH8GOq5LPjcUA1O3U9Z1UDV//9aZGnGm4lrAM6SLhPS/7oXDL7tB ryLIkb3AEDuGs9IoDPkTqt4AvuL1sx+Eq4uNstUwZOSDgL11aVuqB/sldb7TA2AGHjGv x4EZnw82dv/cQxceTuho+KpRittxDc+z5ZbBKKTCcsIDUmo4lKgkQLG7BmvBjhcuS4rr XjgtUf3N+OKtX5JWvv/I1F5SG+E42bbo53FoYLYj5PejMQVBBOWg0vOrNxFW9AcBoCv3 3B3reOs8xzNeMf9otXaLElAZ7bWhkTWsO2FOH1g7KrXRcq2tNFzu7rabwTT+zxG2Z5Ok kRkA==
In-reply-to: <20140202152106.GL20939@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1391319694-3089-1-git-send-email-linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx> <20140202151624.GK20939@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140202152106.GL20939@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
2014-02-03 0:21 GMT+09:00, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx>:
> On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 08:16:24AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:41:34PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
>> > The semantics of this flag are following:
>> > 1) It collapses the range lying between offset and length by removing
>> > any data
>> >    blocks which are present in this range and than updates all the
>> > logical
>> >    offsets of extents beyond "offset + len" to nullify the hole created
>> > by
>> >    removing blocks. In short, it does not leave a hole.
>> > 2) It should be used exclusively. No other fallocate flag in
>> > combination.
>> > 3) Offset and length supplied to fallocate should be fs block size
>> > aligned
>> >    in case of xfs and ext4.
>> > 4) Collaspe range does not work beyond i_size.
>>
>> What if the file is mmaped at the time somebody issues this command?
>> Seems to me we should drop pagecache pages that overlap with the
>> removed blocks.  If the removed range is not a multiple of PAGE_SIZE,
>> then we should also drop any pagecache pages after the removed range.
Hi Matthew.
Yes, right. So both xfs and ext4 call truncate_pagecache_range to drop
page caches before removing blocks.
truncate_pagecache_range(inode, offset, -1);
and end offset is -1, which mean all page cache will be dropped from
start offset to the end of file.
>
> Oops, forgot to add "and if it is a multiple of page size, then we need
> to update the offsets of any pages after the removed page".  We should
> probably start easy though; just drop all pages that overlap the beginning
> of the affected range to the end of the file.
Yes, right. current implementation does exactly as you pointed

>  At some later point,
> if there's demand, we can add the optimisation to adjust the offsets of
> pages still in the cache.
-> Yes, Right. But if we consider that fs block size can be less than
page cache size,(512B, 1K, 2K)
I thought that it is proper to drop all pages from the start offset to
the end of the file.

Thanks for your reply.
>
> --
> Matthew Wilcox                                Intel Open Source Technology 
> Centre
> "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
> operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
> a retrograde step."
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>