[PATCH 0/9] current series for verifier error differentiation

To:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	[PATCH 0/9] current series for verifier error differentiation
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:52:20 -0600
Delivered-to:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx

This is the current series I have leading up to verifier error differentiation,
just resending them all.

As I send this, I remember that EILSEQ is giving us an unusual perror()
output, so the last patch which uses it may need to pick some (?)
other error code...

-Eric

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH 0/9] current series for verifier error differentiation, Eric Sandeen <= [PATCH 1/9] xfs: skip verification on initial "guess" superblock read, Eric Sandeen Re: [PATCH 1/9] xfs: skip verification on initial "guess" superblock read, Dave Chinner [PATCH 8/9] xfs: print useful caller information in xfs_error_report, Eric Sandeen Re: [PATCH 8/9] xfs: print useful caller information in xfs_error_report, Jeff Liu [PATCH 6/9] xfs: add helper for updating checksums on xfs_bufs, Eric Sandeen [PATCH 7/9] xfs: add xfs_verifier_error(), Eric Sandeen Re: [PATCH 7/9] xfs: add xfs_verifier_error(), Dave Chinner [PATCH 7/9 V2] xfs: add xfs_verifier_error(), Eric Sandeen Re: [PATCH 7/9 V2] xfs: add xfs_verifier_error(), Dave Chinner [PATCH 4/9] xfs: Use defines for CRC offsets in all cases, Eric Sandeen

Previous by Date:	Re: Question regarding XFS on LVM over hardware RAID., Stan Hoeppner
Next by Date:	[PATCH 1/9] xfs: skip verification on initial "guess" superblock read, Eric Sandeen
Previous by Thread:	[ANNOUNCE] xfstests: master branch updated to db6d20e, Dave Chinner
Next by Thread:	[PATCH 1/9] xfs: skip verification on initial "guess" superblock read, Eric Sandeen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]