| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keith Keller <kkeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: list spam |
| From: | Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:59:57 -0600 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20140218212232.GG13647@dastard> |
| References: | <530386A3.1000604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <53039793.4040809@xxxxxxx> <jqpctax071.ln2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140218212232.GG13647@dastard> |
| Reply-to: | stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 |
On 2/18/2014 3:22 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: ... > I don't know if anyone has noticed, but a large amount of the spam > is directed at the deprecated linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx list aliases. > Kill that alias, and a large amount of the spam disappears. 53/173, non-scientific, in my folders, so roughly 1/3rd of spam getting through the nets is addressed to the deprecated address. I agree, kill that alias. > FWIW, from the perspective of someone who has a lot of lists > directing email at him, the XFS list is no worse than most others. Maybe my vision is skewed. The only other open list I sub is linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It has a little less average volume than xfs, but only like one spam every few days gets through. -- Stan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [ANNOUNCE] xfstests: master branch updated to db6d20e, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: list spam, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: list spam, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: list spam, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |