xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v2] xfstests: test for atime-related mount options

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfstests: test for atime-related mount options
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:05:03 +1100
Cc: Koen De Wit <koen.de.wit@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <530273CD.3090303@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1392668720-6135-1-git-send-email-koen.de.wit@xxxxxxxxxx> <530273CD.3090303@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 02:40:45PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 2/17/14, 2:25 PM, Koen De Wit wrote:
> > Tests the noatime, relatime, strictatime and nodiratime mount options.
> > 
> > There is an extra check for Btrfs to ensure that the access time is
> > never updated on read-only subvolumes. (Regression test for bug fixed
> > with commit 93fd63c2f001ca6797c6b15b696a484b165b4800)
> 
> I think this looks ok.  Only little nit is that _require_relatime
> now implicitly requires scratch, but *shrug* it was Dave's idea.  ;)

There's a _require_scratch call in there, so it's all good. ;)
Thanks Koen!

> Thanks!
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>

And thanks for the reivew, Eric ;)

Cheers,

Dave.

-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>