Re: 3.14.0-rc2: WARNING: at mm/slub.c:1007

[Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 at 12:14, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > OK, so the "possible irq lock inversion dependency detected" is a lockdep 
> > regression, as you explained in the xfs-list thread. What about the 
> > "RECLAIM_FS-safe -> RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock order detected" warning - I 
> > haven't seen it again though, only once with 3.14.0-rc2.
> 
> That was also an i_lock/mmapsem issue, so it's likely to be the same
> root cause. I'm testing a fix for it at the moment.

Understood. Thanks for looking into this.

Christian.
-- 
BOFH excuse #129:

The ring needs another token