xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: btrfs/004: fix to make test really work

To: Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@xxxxxxxxx>, <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: btrfs/004: fix to make test really work
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:18:02 -0500
Cc: <linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fb.com; h=message-id : date : from : mime-version : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=facebook; bh=760UOfFNkPQSkecnkR9X7STkbkeACes24rG2H2XT1Yo=; b=EbU2RE9n8DGQCTshwuyUUGc5/5PfVIanSDFTMOd9dQr0FleIaPFXXT/i5d1ADB91fkk0 80udgxERp+1vxZKLNSkRH3s3VJfPBgoKcRhEnvefRoKf9T0g7hMNpIrXNBVA7MPzcWsN vN5a70B5ZzcJNe++Q5B2h4acEOU1VyPSTcg=
In-reply-to: <1392034256-2412-1-git-send-email-wangshilong1991@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <1392034256-2412-1-git-send-email-wangshilong1991@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0


On 02/10/2014 07:10 AM, Wang Shilong wrote:
From: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

So i was wandering why test 004 could pass my previous wrong
kernel patch while it defenitely should not.

By some debugging, i found here perl script is wrong, we did not
filter out anything and this unit test did not work acutally.so
it came out we will never fail this test.


So now with this patch I'm failing it, is there some btrfs patch I need to make it not fail or is it still not supposed to fail normally and is this patch broken? Thanks,

Josef

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>