[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v3] Btrfs: add regression test for running snapshot and send

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Btrfs: add regression test for running snapshot and send concurrently
From: Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:18:31 +0800
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jbacik@xxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Vtv5Bi01sUK7vxG1FZHdtvP1OM5zZbOOTBkFoz0AJEM=; b=Urt0TNAcctNfJEbeC3itEzWbg/xCBpBcWmcygQdmGkz3n4CF+EDK0AAuP+QW+bP6d/ T5eVqosTz6+cOk6nPhoD5anG4GdAd4HzWAfg5PxCxvN3rV8CFlzas02kEvMCKnsIaFH2 wzorwdHzCnyOc8X21kA3rTiDrBg//w2ulKCI+8K3fri7NSFo66UagmjOPZuJ8eFbwqal ImVUinPC4OapI693B+PZiLmSk11JOkZzMts7fBX2vr+sjCimQkVQ1VNfZyb2HCcF8tq9 LqC9yRU4NbSieDewPO5aK2twkZMCX7xZVSVkl095h/WPLUauIDH7XzA9l9jyDeI7/LOf Qsqg==
In-reply-to: <20140206224337.GB13647@dastard>
References: <1391703008-2322-1-git-send-email-wangshilong1991@xxxxxxxxx> <20140206224337.GB13647@dastard>
Hi Dave,

> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 12:10:08AM +0800, Wang Shilong wrote:
>> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \
>> +    $SCRATCH_MNT/snap_1 >> $seqres.full 2>&1
>> +
>> +do_snapshots &
>> +snapshots_pid=$!
>> +
>> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap_1 > /dev/null 2>&1 || echo "btrfs 
>> send failed"
> Let's stop this anti-pattern before it takes hold.
> If there's output from the send command it should be
> filtered and captured in the golden image. Hence any deviation
> caused by errors is automatically flagged as an error.
> That's the whole point of using golden images for capturing errors -
> you don't need to capture return values from binaries and it
> guarantees that users are informed about failures through error
> messages. IOWs:
> $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap_1 | _btrfs_send_filter
> is what you should be doing here.

I knew what you mean here, in fact, i did this on purpose.
for this test failure, btrfs-prog did not output failure information from the 
So to make older progs can also detect the test failure, i dropped into this 

Anyway, if you don't like this and think  old btrfs-progs needn't consider 
this,  i will update
the patch.^_^


> Cheers,
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>