> > > BTW, folks, any suggestions about the name of that "memory stream" thing?
> > > struct iov_iter really implies iterator for iovec and more generic name
> > > would probably be better... struct mem_stream would probably do if nobody
> > > comes up with better variant, but it's long and somewhat clumsy...
> >
> > I don't like 'stream'. To me that sounds more strictly advancing than I
> > think this'd be capable of. Maybe something dirt simple like 'mem_vec'?
> > With 'mvec_' call prefixes?
>
> Umm... Frankly, I would rather discourage attempts to read the same data
> twice, if only on the naming level...
Ahh, OK, sure. mem_iter?
- z
|