xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Weird XFS Corruption Error

To: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Weird XFS Corruption Error
From: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:29:35 +0100
Cc: Sascha Askani <saskani@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20140123151943.281baa04@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Intellique
References: <CDBC891F-BCF6-4B9B-ADDB-9E143973D188@xxxxxxxxx> <20140123151943.281baa04@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Le Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:19:43 +0100
Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait:

> OTOH it looks really similar to an older bug :
> 
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-02/msg00482.html
> 
> AFAIK this one could be related to the current Ubuntu LTS lvm stack...
> We need Dave's advice on this one.
> 

Yes, I guess we're getting closer:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2013-February/msg00113.html

"It's reproducable on lots of different kernels, apparently - 3.8,
3.4.33, CentOS 6.3, debian sid/wheezy and Fedora 18 were mentioned
specifically by the OP - so it doesn't look like a recent
regression or constrained to a specific kernel."

And
https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2013-February/msg00122.html :

"Was issue_discards enabled in lvm.conf?

If so, as Alasdair said, this lvm2 2.02.97 fix is needed:
http://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/lvm2.git/commit/?id=07a25c249b3e "


What is the version of lvm ( dpkg -l lvm2 )?


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac     |   Direction technique
                    |   Intellique
                    |   <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
                    |   +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>