| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | xfsprogs 3.1.12 and 3.2.0 releases? |
| From: | Arkadiusz MiÅkiewicz <arekm@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 20 Jan 2014 18:22:48 +0100 |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=maven.pl; s=maven; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=tFgTOmuCDysbhPvoDDU7L9Nhu57DwKzN7Wny0/dCuBA=; b=QK/wudJADmCvHcuv3n+te986uGEjOO7Vrnq5MMz704zY3GoCwCKMgydrD9ugoXvpDq nKgaElRamEYCj82oJ3E0T8xOKIMNJKJYkzsAi/kvSzdm/wZBLGK6mmcbQkG2xV8hr1gI s6+cuZz8BCJ0PxSEX8PSjU/WAhiX2wqGX/gqw= |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.13.0-final-dirty; KDE/4.12.0; x86_64; ; ) |
Hello. What's needed for both 3.1.12 and 3.2.0 releases to happen? If 3.2.0 is to be released soon then nice. Dave, AFAIK it is waiting for you and xfs_db crc work only? If 3.2.0 is far away then it would be nice to see 3.1.12 with bugfixes only (for those paranoid about new stuff) but 3.1.13 very soon after that with backported features like project quota support, parallelism, performance improvements. Obviously I hope 3.2.0 is soon and there is no need to waste effort on 3.1.x. -- Arkadiusz MiÅkiewicz, arekm / maven.pl |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH RESEND] ext4: regression test for ext4 resize with non-extent files, Rich Johnston |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/5] xfstests: use value of FSTYP if defined externally, David Sterba |
| Previous by Thread: | Investing In Your Country, Mr. Pkr |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfsprogs 3.1.12 and 3.2.0 releases?, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |