xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 0/5] splice: locking changes and code refactoring

To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] splice: locking changes and code refactoring
From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 20:10:31 +0000
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@xxxxxxxx>, Joel Becker <jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Steve French <sfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CA+55aFzM0N7WjqnLNnuqTkbj3iws9f3bYxei=ZBCM8hvps4zYg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20131212181459.994196463@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140113141416.GA30117@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140113235646.GR10323@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140114132207.GA25170@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140114172033.GU10323@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140118064040.GE10323@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CA+55aFw4LgyYEkygxHUnpKZg3jMACGzsyENc9a9rWFmLcaRefQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140118074649.GF10323@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CA+55aFzM0N7WjqnLNnuqTkbj3iws9f3bYxei=ZBCM8hvps4zYg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:59:56AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:22:04PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Objections, comments?
> >>
> >> I certainly object to the "map, then unmap" approach. No VM games.
> >
> > Um...
> >
> > If we are going to copy that data (and all users of 
> > generic_file_splice_write()
> > do that memcpy() to page cache), we have to kmap the source ;-/
> 
> Yeah, the kmap/kunmap we have to do. But that's a no-op on 64-bit, and
> has to be done one page at a time (well, I guess you could do a
> couple).
> 
> But you can't do that *around* the default_file_splice_write(), so I
> thought you meant some kind of "map into user space". And I absolutely
> *detest* that kind of approach.

Ouch...  No, I hadn't meant that kind of insanity, but I'd missed the
problem with scarcity of mappings completely...

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>