| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: require 64-bit sector_t |
| From: | Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 9 Jan 2014 09:19:03 -0600 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20131216221559.GO1935@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20131114164603.GA13628@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131216221559.GO1935@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:15:59PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote:
> Hey Christoph,
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 08:46:03AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Trying to support tiny disks only and saving a bit memory might have
> > made sense on an SGI O2 15 years ago, but is pretty pointless today.
> >
> > Remove the rarely tested codepath that uses various smaller in-memory
> > types to reduce our test matrix and make the codebase a little bit
> > smaller and less complicated.
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
>
> This looks ok to me. I'm not seeing much downside to removing the smaller
> in-memory types.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Anyone else have an opinion on this one? I think its 3.14 material and I'd
like to pull it in.
Thanks,
Ben
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LA FRATERNITE BILLION BILLION""" CLUB DES MILLIADAIRES""", lafratellanza billionbillion |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Offices & Showroom Building for sale in IASI, Romania, office |
| Previous by Thread: | LA FRATERNITE BILLION BILLION""" CLUB DES MILLIADAIRES""", lafratellanza billionbillion |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: require 64-bit sector_t, Michael L. Semon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |