| To: | viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 00/21] Consolidate Posix ACL implementation V3 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 7 Jan 2014 07:53:24 -0800 |
| Cc: | linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@xxxxxxxx>, Joel Becker <jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, reiserfs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, cluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andreas Gruenbacher <andreas.gruenbacher@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20131220131635.650823732@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20131220131635.650823732@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 05:16:35AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > This series consolidates the various cut'n'pasted Posix ACL implementations > into a single common one based on the ->get_acl method Linus added a while > ago and a new ->set_acl counterpart. > > This remove ~1800 lines of code and provides a single place to implement > various nasty little gems of the semantics. Any more comments? Al, what's the best way to make sure this doesn't miss 3.14? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: noob question, Fitzgerald, Dan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: Calling destroy_work_on_stack() to pair with INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(), Ben Myers |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 2/3] xfs: Calling destroy_work_on_stack() to pair with INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(), Chuansheng Liu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] xfs: add O_TMPFILE support, Ben Myers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |