[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix off-by-one error in xfs_attr3_rmt_verify

To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix off-by-one error in xfs_attr3_rmt_verify
From: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 15:02:11 +0800
Cc: "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <52CABFD1.70100@xxxxxxx>
References: <52C3FBC3.3050304@xxxxxxxxxx> <52CABFD1.70100@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
On 01/06 2014 22:38 PM, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> On 01/01/14 05:28, Jeff Liu wrote:
>> From: Jie Liu<jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> With CRC check is enabled, if trying to set an attributes value just
>> equal to the maximum size of XATTR_SIZE_MAX would cause the v3 remote
>> attr write verification procedure failure, which would yield the back
>> trace like below:
>> <snip>
>> XFS (sda7): Internal error xfs_attr3_rmt_write_verify at line 191 of
>> file fs/xfs/xfs_attr_remote.c
>> <snip>
>> Call Trace:
>> Tests:
>>      setfattr -n user.longxattr -v `perl -e 'print "A"x65536'` testfile
>> This patch fix it to check the remote EA size is greater than the
>> XATTR_SIZE_MAX rather than more than or equal to it, because it's
>> valid if the specified EA value size is equal to the limitation as
>> per VFS setxattr interface.
>> Signed-off-by: Jie Liu<jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
> Good catch. Are you making an edge case xfstest?

I plan to introduce a particular test case into generic subclass.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>