xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove the incorrect entry in the MAINTAINER file

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove the incorrect entry in the MAINTAINER file
From: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 14:16:35 -0600
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Zhi Yong Wu <zwu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>, Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20131216152053.GB12360@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1386935393-23559-1-git-send-email-zwu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> <20131213163131.GC20803@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131213202747.GL1935@xxxxxxx> <20131213220110.GW10988@dastard> <20131216152053.GB12360@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 07:20:53AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 09:01:10AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > Well, I stand by what I wrote in that thread. There is absolutely
> > nothing wrong with having xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx listed as a maintainer;
> > different and unusual doesn't mean it is wrong.
> 
> I think life is much better if XFS follows the usual convention.  We
> already drill into submitters heads that they should send patches and
> questions to the list for the whole kernel, and the angry behaviour of
> many maintainers when they get personal mail helps with that, too.
> 
> Given that we already have maintainers names listed, and the list in the
> proper field I also can't see what this should buy us.

Either way is fine with me.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>