xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix off-by-one error in xfs_attr3_rmt_verify

To: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix off-by-one error in xfs_attr3_rmt_verify
From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 08:38:09 -0600
Cc: "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <52C3FBC3.3050304@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <52C3FBC3.3050304@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120122 Thunderbird/9.0
On 01/01/14 05:28, Jeff Liu wrote:
From: Jie Liu<jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>

With CRC check is enabled, if trying to set an attributes value just
equal to the maximum size of XATTR_SIZE_MAX would cause the v3 remote
attr write verification procedure failure, which would yield the back
trace like below:

<snip>
XFS (sda7): Internal error xfs_attr3_rmt_write_verify at line 191 of file 
fs/xfs/xfs_attr_remote.c
<snip>
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff816f0042>] dump_stack+0x45/0x56
[<ffffffffa0d99c8b>] xfs_error_report+0x3b/0x40 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa0d96edd>] ? _xfs_buf_ioapply+0x6d/0x390 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa0d99ce5>] xfs_corruption_error+0x55/0x80 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa0dbef6b>] xfs_attr3_rmt_write_verify+0x14b/0x1a0 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa0d96edd>] ? _xfs_buf_ioapply+0x6d/0x390 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa0d97315>] ? xfs_bdstrat_cb+0x55/0xb0 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa0d96edd>] _xfs_buf_ioapply+0x6d/0x390 [xfs]
[<ffffffff81184cda>] ? vm_map_ram+0x31a/0x460
[<ffffffff81097230>] ? wake_up_state+0x20/0x20
[<ffffffffa0d97315>] ? xfs_bdstrat_cb+0x55/0xb0 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa0d9726b>] xfs_buf_iorequest+0x6b/0xc0 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa0d97315>] xfs_bdstrat_cb+0x55/0xb0 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa0d97906>] xfs_bwrite+0x46/0x80 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa0dbfa94>] xfs_attr_rmtval_set+0x334/0x490 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa0db84aa>] xfs_attr_leaf_addname+0x24a/0x410 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa0db8893>] xfs_attr_set_int+0x223/0x470 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa0db8b76>] xfs_attr_set+0x96/0xb0 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa0db13b2>] xfs_xattr_set+0x42/0x70 [xfs]
[<ffffffff811df9b2>] generic_setxattr+0x62/0x80
[<ffffffff811e0213>] __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x63/0x1b0
[<ffffffff81307afe>] ? evm_inode_setxattr+0xe/0x10
[<ffffffff811e0415>] vfs_setxattr+0xb5/0xc0
[<ffffffff811e054e>] setxattr+0x12e/0x1c0
[<ffffffff811c6e82>] ? final_putname+0x22/0x50
[<ffffffff811c708b>] ? putname+0x2b/0x40
[<ffffffff811cc4bf>] ? user_path_at_empty+0x5f/0x90
[<ffffffff811bdfd9>] ? __sb_start_write+0x49/0xe0
[<ffffffff81168589>] ? vm_mmap_pgoff+0x99/0xc0
[<ffffffff811e07df>] SyS_setxattr+0x8f/0xe0
[<ffffffff81700c2d>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f

Tests:
     setfattr -n user.longxattr -v `perl -e 'print "A"x65536'` testfile

This patch fix it to check the remote EA size is greater than the
XATTR_SIZE_MAX rather than more than or equal to it, because it's
valid if the specified EA value size is equal to the limitation as
per VFS setxattr interface.

Signed-off-by: Jie Liu<jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

Good catch. Are you making an edge case xfstest?

Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>