| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Arkadiusz MiÅkiewicz <arekm@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [xfs_check Out of memory: ] |
| From: | Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 29 Dec 2013 19:55:13 -0600 |
| Cc: | Stor?? <289471341@xxxxxx>, Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20131229095033.GL20579@dastard> |
| References: | <tencent_3F12563342ED1D4E049D1123@xxxxxx> <201312270907.22638.arekm@xxxxxxxx> <20131227224212.GK20579@dastard> <201312280020.39244.arekm@xxxxxxxx> <20131229095033.GL20579@dastard> |
| Reply-to: | stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
On 12/29/2013 3:50 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: ... > I think you are forgetting that developer time is *expensive* and > *scarce*. This is essentially a solved problem: An SSD in a USB3 > enclosure as a temporary swap device is by far the most cost > effective way to make repair scale to arbitrary amounts of metadata. > It certainly scales far better than developer time and testing > resources... Now this is an interesting idea Dave. I hadn't considered temporary swap. Would USB be reliable enough for this? I've seen lots problem reports with folks using USB storage with Linux, random disconnections and what not. -- Stan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [xfs_check Out of memory: ], Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Votre toile photo pour moins de 10 euros, Poster XXL |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [xfs_check Out of memory: ], Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [xfs_check Out of memory: ], Matthias Schniedermeyer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |