xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC] Userspace and xfstests releases

To: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Userspace and xfstests releases
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 09:04:46 +1100
Cc: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20131219193314.GX1935@xxxxxxx>
References: <52B06E51.1020504@xxxxxxx> <52B32CE0.5070701@xxxxxxx> <20131219193314.GX1935@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 01:33:14PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote:
> Hey Rich,
> 
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:29:04AM -0600, Rich Johnston wrote:
> > On 12/17/2013 09:31 AM, Rich Johnston wrote:
> > >I was planning on a xfsdump and xfstests release this week before I go
> > >on vacation. Any objections?
> > Currently xfstests is not released, should this be changed?
> > 
> > I will wait until I return on Jan 2 to release xfsprogs.
> > 
> > >
> > >Release versions for xfsprogs are still being discussed. Are there any
> > >more comments on this subject?
> > Here is one of the threads discussing this.
> > 
> > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-10/msg00421.html
> > Christoph were you saying you create xfsprogs branches?
> > 
> > Is there a consensus on version names/branches for xfsprogs?
> 
> I suggest a branch directly off of 3.1.11 release, and then we can troll the
> log between refs/tags/3.1.11 and master for bugfixes.
> 
> e.g. git checkout -b for-3.1.12 refs/tags/3.1.11
> 
> And then push it up to oss.

Agreed - we're not really ready for a 3.2.0 release yet. I also
think that we'll need a couple of weeks to test any 3.1.12 branch
that is made before it can be released, too.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>