[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC] Userspace and xfstests releases

To: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Userspace and xfstests releases
From: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:33:14 -0600
Cc: xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <52B32CE0.5070701@xxxxxxx>
References: <52B06E51.1020504@xxxxxxx> <52B32CE0.5070701@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Hey Rich,

On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:29:04AM -0600, Rich Johnston wrote:
> On 12/17/2013 09:31 AM, Rich Johnston wrote:
> >I was planning on a xfsdump and xfstests release this week before I go
> >on vacation. Any objections?
> Currently xfstests is not released, should this be changed?
> I will wait until I return on Jan 2 to release xfsprogs.
> >
> >Release versions for xfsprogs are still being discussed. Are there any
> >more comments on this subject?
> Here is one of the threads discussing this.
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-10/msg00421.html
> Christoph were you saying you create xfsprogs branches?
> Is there a consensus on version names/branches for xfsprogs?

I suggest a branch directly off of 3.1.11 release, and then we can troll the
log between refs/tags/3.1.11 and master for bugfixes.

e.g. git checkout -b for-3.1.12 refs/tags/3.1.11

And then push it up to oss.

Just my 2c.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>