[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC] Handling of reviewed patch series

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Handling of reviewed patch series
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 03:19:59 -0800
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20131213053611.GQ10988@dastard>
References: <20131213053611.GQ10988@dastard>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
I'm a big fan of the for-next vs for-linux split for next release work
vs bugfixes which we've not applied yet.  The whole topic branches
scheme makes sense for large changes like the crc work, but seems
utterly confusing if applied to every little change, as now the amount
of branches you can conflict againt multiplies.  I'm defintively in
favour of a model that has less active branches.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>