xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 05/10] xfstests: do not unmount tmpfs during remount.

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] xfstests: do not unmount tmpfs during remount.
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 03:12:18 -0800
Cc: Junho Ryu <jayr@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>, Boris Ranto <branto@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20131213014131.GP10988@dastard>
References: <1386706321-15795-1-git-send-email-jayr@xxxxxxxxxx> <1386706321-15795-6-git-send-email-jayr@xxxxxxxxxx> <20131211074615.GE19248@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131211224012.GJ10988@dastard> <20131212180130.GA19422@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131212225657.GK10988@dastard> <CAFA30n9ea3A+V7JgCgqO5xOQchgB55oLP4AgtQ3KQpCMr9iEzQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131213014131.GP10988@dastard>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:41:31PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> All the generic tests that use dm_flakey are likely to be busted.
> Anything assumes SCRATCH_DEV or TEST_DEV are block devices are
> busted.

These are already busted on nfs, which we've support in some form
forever, and cifs, and btrfs with it's pools if they assume the
actual device is the block device.

> Do loop devices work properly when hosted on tmpfs
> filesystems? And so on...

They do.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>