| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 5/5] xfs: assert that we hold the ilock for extent map access |
| From: | Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:11:55 -0600 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20131205155951.874279041@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20131205155830.620826868@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131205155951.874279041@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 07:58:35AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Make sure that xfs_bmapi_read has the ilock held in some way, and that > xfs_bmapi_write, xfs_bmapi_delay and xfs_iread_extents are called with > the ilock held exclusively. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: use xfs_ilock_map_shared in xfs_attr_get, Ben Myers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/5] xfs: take the ilock around xfs_bmapi_read in xfs_zero_remaining_bytes, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 5/5] xfs: assert that we hold the ilock for extent map access, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 5/5] xfs: assert that we hold the ilock for extent map access, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |