xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 5/5] xfs: assert that we hold the ilock for extent map access

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] xfs: assert that we hold the ilock for extent map access
From: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:11:55 -0600
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20131205155951.874279041@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20131205155830.620826868@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131205155951.874279041@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 07:58:35AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Make sure that xfs_bmapi_read has the ilock held in some way, and that
> xfs_bmapi_write, xfs_bmapi_delay and xfs_iread_extents are called with
> the ilock held exclusively.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>